![]() |
The World According To |
![]() |
|
BILL SHAW ANSWERS THE MAIL I was pleased to learn about your organization. John Parker and I are original owners of Elnath, hull #157, a keel-centerboard Pearson 34. I have particularly enjoyed the boat this year after acquiring a spinnaker for the first time. I would be most grateful if you or perhaps one of your organization could help me answer three questions about the boat. First, have keel-centerboard P34s experienced the same failure of the spade rudder described in the May 1991 edition of Practical Sailor? We have had no problem so far. If widespread problems exist, is there a recommendation about how to strengthen or if need be replace the rudder at this time. Second, have owners experienced problems with the original shaft seal as we did and are there recommendations about replacement? Third, does anyone know what type of varnish was used as the original finish on the interior? I look forward to participating in your organization. Dear John, Thanks for your efforts toward getting parts, info, etc., for our boats. Way down South we have many people who praise these boats, and this being my very first sailboat, Im glad for what it is: Pearson 23, 1978 model. The questions I have for Mr. Shaw are: Is the CB ballasted? If so how much? Do I need plans for laying one up, or is there anywhere I can purchase one? How much different is performance/handling without the centerboard? As far as parts for the centerboard, could I get a schematic of/or parts list that includes the rod the centerboard swings onmine is broken off. (It looks like a connecting rod for a Chevrolet V/8 engine.) I also need the keel cable and pin that draws the keel up. Possibly he can direct me toward these parts. Again, thank you for your efforts and Im looking forward to reading the newsletters and future information. Dear John, My boating days may be coming to a close. I bought a used Pearson 35 (#95) in 1974 and have owned it since. Now that I am almost 78 years old with a wife (Capt., that is . . .) who just had her 75th our boating activities have suffered and I contemplate its sale. The boat is berthed at Chesapeake Boat Basin in Indian Creek just north of the Rappahannock River on the western shore of the Bay. In an effort to extend our boating days two years ago, I added a roller furling jib (Profurl #L-31) sail by Scott in Annapolis. I recommend this rig as it has been completely trouble-free. Rigging was done by Ocran Boat Yard in Dymer Creek, just below Indian Creek. One can buy cheaper but I doubt it will be better. I also recommend "New Englands" 3/8" regatta braid furing linesoft to handle and no hockles. A friend of mine has a Pearson 35 that ran into a problem while transitting the Inland Waterway several years ago. In alligator River he lost steerage when the rudder separated from the rudder post. He was towed and hauled. It was determined that the rudder plate imbedded in the fiberglass and welded to the rudder post broke at the weld. The yard was able (at considerable expense) to cut into the rudder, welded some reinforcing straps to both the imbedded plate and to the post and re-glassed the rudder. Ever since his experience, I have my fingers crossed in dirty weather; when is mine going to go? Is there a way to foretell this weakness? Could one buy an improved rudder today? I mention this incident because I feel it is typical of what one might want from NPYOA. Is this the type of problem that may be addressed by some old hands? Another item of interest to me is the availability of brown plastic extrusion used in the cabin sole hatches sill available? Still another is the after port light in the salon area. This is an aluminum extrusion and several tries to render it watertight between the glass and the extrusion have failed. There are some items for a newsletter. Also repowering is always a consideration on older boats. When the advertising says a particular engine is an exact interchange with the Atomic Four I question it. Like the Hertz ad on TV, "Well, not exactly" . . . . My Pearson was furnished with the Atomic four without reduction gear. I always felt that Pearson should never have been offered that model without a 2:1 reduction gear so as to swing a larger prop with greater pitch. Might sacrifice a little speed under sail but gain improved performance when docking in strong currents on the Intracoastal Waterway or when bucking heavy seas while cruising. Presumably, one interested in racing would have bought a different boat . . . . There you have some thoughts that may be typical of Pearson 35 owners. Dear Donald, My 1980 Pearson 40 has small blisters similar to those described by Richard Duval in Vol. 2, No. 3, in his article "A Magic Carpet Ride to Turkey." My bottom paint lasts less than one year in a fresh water lake with these blisters. What is currently believed to be the best treatment for this problem? My hull specialist at my marina (where they build the Valiant Yachts) says epoxy has proven to be unacceptable due to cracking after a few years. He is recommending a new vinyl product, but has had no experience with it. How would you treat the problem? Dear James, I am writing to inquire if your file of back issues contains an answer to my question: On a P-39 sloop, is there a design criterion for use of the centerboard? i.e., a condition beyond which the board should/should not be used? I dont use the board too often and I have talked to others who say they almost never use it. Dear Bill, The Ensign Class has found a source for Pearson Ensign mast sections, however, they are not anodized. Can NPYOA recommend a business where we could ship these masts for anodizing. Dear Robert, |